lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 4 Nov 2016 01:28:57 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Markus Mayer <code@...yer.net>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Power Management List <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Broadcom Kernel List <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: stats: clear statistics

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Markus Mayer <code@...yer.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>
>
> Allow cpufreq statistics to be cleared by writing anything to
> /sys/.../cpufreq/stats/reset. Reading this new sysfs entry returns
> nothing.
>
> Resetting the statistics can be useful in a test environment (test
> governor, retrieve stats, reset stats, test other governor, etc.). This
> feature is not meant for production use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@...adcom.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig         | 10 ++++++++++
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> index d8b164a..97a458e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> @@ -45,6 +45,16 @@ config CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>
>           If in doubt, say N.
>
> +config CPU_FREQ_STAT_RESET
> +       bool "Allow reset of CPU frequency transition statistics"
> +       depends on CPU_FREQ_STAT
> +       help
> +         If enabled, writing to /sys/[...]/cpufreq/stats/reset will reset the
> +         current CPUfreq statistics. This is primarily meant for testing. It
> +         should not be enabled on a production system.
> +
> +         If in doubt, say N.
> +
>  choice
>         prompt "Default CPUFreq governor"
>         default CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE if ARM_SA1100_CPUFREQ || ARM_SA1110_CPUFREQ
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> index 06d3abd..e4e1e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_stats.c
> @@ -111,6 +111,35 @@ static ssize_t show_trans_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(trans_table);
>  #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_RESET
> +static void cpufreq_stats_clear_table(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +       struct cpufreq_stats *stats = policy->stats;
> +       unsigned int count = stats->max_state;
> +
> +       memset(stats->time_in_state, 0, count * sizeof(u64));
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
> +       memset(stats->trans_table, 0, count * count * sizeof(int));
> +#endif
> +       stats->last_time = get_jiffies_64();
> +       stats->total_trans = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_reset(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> +{
> +       buf[0] = '\0';
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t store_reset(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
> +                          size_t count)
> +{
> +       cpufreq_stats_clear_table(policy);
> +       return count;
> +}
> +cpufreq_freq_attr_rw(reset);
> +#endif
> +
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(total_trans);
>  cpufreq_freq_attr_ro(time_in_state);
>
> @@ -120,6 +149,9 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS
>         &trans_table.attr,
>  #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT_RESET
> +       &reset.attr,
> +#endif
>         NULL
>  };
>  static struct attribute_group stats_attr_group = {
> --

What would be wrong with adding this unconditionally?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ