lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:43:33 +0100
From:   Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Retrofit
 pci_platform_pm_ops ->get_state hook

Hi! On 26.10.2016 17:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 15:06 +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 08:19 +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>
>> So the conclusion is to apply this patch now and go and look further @
>> locking in a separate series right ? There's not much point in leaving
>> Edison not booting as is the case with tip-of-tree right now.
> That's what I think is a summary of the discussion.

Did anything happen after that conclusion? Just wondering, because this
bug is on the list of regressions for 4.9 and I think the proposed fix
hasn't reached mainline yet (or did I miss it?)

Ciao, Thorsten (regression tracker for 4.9)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists