linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: fsl-mc: include: mc-bus: Kernel type 's16' preferred over 'int16

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 13:24:13 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Shiva Kerdel <shiva@...ev.nl>
Cc:     stuart.yoder@....com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        German.Rivera@...escale.com, nipun.gupta@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, german.rivera@....com,
        treding@...dia.com, itai.katz@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Staging: fsl-mc: include: mc-bus: Kernel type
 's16' preferred over 'int16_t'

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:42:13PM +0100, Shiva Kerdel wrote:
> Follow the kernel type preferrences of using 's16' over 'int16_t'.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Kerdel <shiva@...ev.nl>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/fsl-mc/include/mc-bus.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

What is different from your v1 patch?

I'm confused now, I have two different series from you, one 6 patches
long, and one 2 patches long, claiming to do the same thing.

I've dropped them both from my patch review queue and please, resend
what you really want me to apply :)

thanks,

greg k-h