linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: pwm: fix syntax errors in the examples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:05:59 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] regulator: pwm: fix syntax errors in the examples

On 2016-11-10 17:18, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:25:27AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> While at it, clean up some other things as well.
> 
> This isn't a useful changelog, it's just saying that there's some
> random changes for no reason.  Please make proper patches with
> changelogs that explain them.

It's a very uninteresting patch, I guess I made a changelog to match.
But I can't help myself from asking a few qustions...

Patch*es* and changelog*s*?

Oh, you want me to split into a series of several patches? One for the
quotes, one for the "../regultor/" removal, one for the empty
comment removal and one for the s/pwm_reglator/pwm-regulator/ thing?

Be careful what you ask for, you might get it...

Or are you saying that patches that I make have poor descriptions
in general?

Anyway, I'm done with that file, if you want crappy docs, by all
means throw the patch away.

Cheers,
Peter