[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:19:52 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: schedutil: enable fast switch earlier
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:52:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -456,8 +460,6 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
> out:
> mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
> -
> - cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(policy);
> return 0;
>
> fail:
> @@ -468,6 +470,10 @@ static int sugov_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> mutex_unlock(&global_tunables_lock);
>
> sugov_policy_free(sg_policy);
> +
> + disable_fast_switch:
> + cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(policy);
> +
> pr_err("initialization failed (error %d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
Argh, no indented labels please. Please fix the 3 that snuck in while
you're there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists