linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs: jfs: Replace CURRENT_TIME_SEC by current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:50:29 -0800
From:   Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        y2038 Mailman List <y2038@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] fs: jfs: Replace CURRENT_TIME_SEC by current_time()

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Dave Kleikamp
<dave.kleikamp@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 12:00 PM, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> jfs uses nanosecond granularity for filesystem timestamps.
>> Only this assignment is not using nanosecond granularity.
>> Use current_time() to get the right granularity.
>
> I had thought these were being handled as a group. I'll push this one
> through the jfs tree.

Yes, that was the original plan.
Then, Greg suggested pushing only the big patches as a group and
sending individual filesystem patches separately.
Big patches introducing current_time() have been merged in 4.9 rc1.

-Deepa