[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:29:02 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
Cc: ext Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: single: check for any error when getting rows
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com> wrote:
> pinctrl_count_index_with_args returns -ENOENT not
> -EINVAL. The return check would pass, and we would
> try to kzalloc with a negative error size throwing
> a warning.
>
> Instead of checking for -EINVAL specifically, lets
> check for any error and avoid negative size allocations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
Patch applied with Tony's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists