linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:02:06 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:     Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...inux.com, ohad@...ery.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/11] remoteproc: st_slim_rproc: add a slimcore
 rproc driver

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:42:16AM +0000, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016, Vinod Koul wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:57:35PM +0000, Peter Griffin wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > As you now make changes to the entire remoteproc Kconfig file, rather
> > > > than simply add a Kconfig symbol we can't bring this in via Vinod's tree
> > > > without providing Linus with a messy merge conflict.
> > > > 
> > > > So the remoteproc parts now has to go through my tree.
> > > 
> > > OK, I think the best approach is for Vinod to create an immutable
> > > branch with the entire fdma series on, and then both of you merge that branch into
> > > your respective trees.
> > 
> > my topic/st_fdma is immutable branch. You cna merge it, if you need a signed
> > tag, please do let me know
> 
> OK.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > That way there won't be any conflicts and you can both accept further changes
> > > for v4.9 release. Trying to take half the series via rproc, and half via dma trees won't work
> > > because they have dependencies on each other.
> > > 
> > > I will send a v11 series in a moment which includes the feedback in this email
> > > and also include the additional fixes which Vinod has applied since the driver
> > > has been in linux-next.
> > 
> > WHY.. Stuff is already merged twice!
> 
> When the feedback is "there is an unrelated change in this patch", the only way
> you can fix that is by having a new version of the patch.

It can be reverted and clean patch applied..

-- 
~Vinod