linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.8 77/92] ACPI/PCI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:32:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.8 77/92] ACPI/PCI: pci_link: Include PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING for ISA IRQs

4.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>

commit 98756f5319c64c883caa910dce702d9edefe7810 upstream.

Commit 103544d86976 ("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: reduce resource requirements")
replaced the addition of PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING in acpi_pci_link_allocate()
with an addition in acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty(), but f7eca374f000
("ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation") removed the use
of acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() for ISA IRQs.

Therefore, PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING is missing from ISA IRQs used by
interrupt links.  Include that penalty by adding it in the
acpi_pci_link_allocate() path.

Fixes: f7eca374f000 (ACPI,PCI,IRQ: separate ISA penalty calculation)
Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Tested-by: Jonathan Liu <net147@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/pci_link.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -608,6 +608,10 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_allocate(struct
 			    acpi_device_bid(link->device));
 		return -ENODEV;
 	} else {
+		if (link->irq.active < ACPI_MAX_ISA_IRQS)
+			acpi_isa_irq_penalty[link->irq.active] +=
+				PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING;
+
 		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "%s [%s] enabled at IRQ %d\n",
 		       acpi_device_name(link->device),
 		       acpi_device_bid(link->device), link->irq.active);