linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:06:41 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support

On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net> wrote:
> On 2016.11.15 18:35 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> -> v2:
>> Notice that intel_cpufreq_target() generally can be called on a CPU
>> different from the target one, so it needs to ensure that the right
>> MSR will be written, so update the code accordingly.  This makes
>> the performance and powersave governors work with this driver as
>> expected (at least).
>
> With V2 I did the exact same tests with the ondemand, powersave,
> and performance governors as I did with the previous versions
> of this patch. Now everything works fine and as expected.

Thanks for the confirmation!

I'll add a Tested-by tag from you to it if you don't mind.

Thanks,
Rafael