linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] infiniband: remove WARN that is not kernel bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2016 21:22:42 -0500
From:   Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     dledford@...hat.com, sean.hefty@...el.com,
        hal.rosenstock@...il.com, leon@...nel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] infiniband: remove WARN that is not kernel bug

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:24:37 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov said:
> WARNINGs mean kernel bugs.
> The one in ucma_write() points to user programming error
> or a malicious attempt. This is not a kernel bug, remove it.

> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ib_safe_file_access(filp)))
> +	if (!ib_safe_file_access(filp))
>  		return -EACCES;

In that case, wouldn't this be better?

	if (!ib_safe_file_access(filp)) {
		printk_once("Process %d (%s) tried to do something hinky", pid, comm);
		return _EACCESS;
	}

so the sysadmin becomes aware of the malicious attempt?

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped