linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:43:34 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG
 Decoder

On 22/11/16 04:21, Rick Chang wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 17/11/16 04:38, Rick Chang wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>> This patch depends on:
>>>   CCF "Add clock support for Mediatek MT2701"[1]
>>>   iommu and smi "Add the dtsi node of iommu and smi for mt2701"[2]
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2016-October/007271.html
>>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9164013/
>>
>> I assume that 1 & 2 will appear in 4.10? So this patch needs to go in
>> after the
>> other two are merged in 4.10?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> 	Hans
>
> [1] will appear in 4.10, but [2] will appear latter than 4.10.So this
> patch needs to go in after [1] & [2] will be merged in 4.11.

So what should I do? Merge the driver for 4.11 and wait with this patch
until [2] is merged in 4.11? Does that sound reasonable?

Regards,

	Hans