linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: Add support for Turris Omnia

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 09:37:10 +0100
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Tomas Hlavacek <tmshlvck@...il.com>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: dts: Add support for Turris Omnia

On 11/23/2016 01:35 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-385-turris-omnia.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Device Tree file for the Turris Omnia
>> + * Schematic available at https://www.turris.cz/doc/_media/rtrom01-schema.pdf
>
> Cool that there is a link to the schematics. But please could you put
> it lower down. It is more likely to be seen if it comes after the
> copyright and license section.

I added to the top because that's where I would look. But checking other
dts files it seems indeed to be more common after the copyright stuff.
I'd suggest to even start a new comment (i.e.

	 * last blabla of copyright
	 */

	/*
	 * Schematic available at ...

) to be more "loud".

@Tomas: I think it doesn't make sense when we alternate sending patches
without prior arrangement. Do you already work on a v5? If not I can do
that to fix the last few comments. Not sure when a submission is too
late to enter v4.10, but I think the window isn't that big any more.

> No leds? No buttons via gpio-keys?

The leds are controlled by a Cortex-M0 and without intervention blink
according to a hardware function (network, power, pci). IMHO that's ok
for an initial setup.

And there are no buttons that are routed to the Armada CPU. Just a reset
button (well, ok, this one is routed to the Armada CPU, but you cannot
make this a gpio-key :-) and the other button is used to control the
brightness of the LEDs and is only routed to the M0.

Best regards
Uwe

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)