linux-kernel - RE: [patch v9 1/1] i2c: add master driver for mellanox systems

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 24 Nov 2016 14:55:35 +0000
From:   Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com>
CC:     "wsa@...-dreams.de" <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>
Subject: RE: [patch v9 1/1] i2c: add master driver for mellanox systems



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa-dev@...g-engineering.com]
> Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 4:52 PM
> To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
> Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de; linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; jiri@...nulli.us; Michael Shych
> <michaelsh@...lanox.com>
> Subject: Re: [patch v9 1/1] i2c: add master driver for mellanox systems
> 
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 04:56:14PM +0000, vadimp@...lanox.com wrote:
> > From: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Device driver for Mellanox I2C controller logic, implemented in
> > Lattice CPLD device.
> > Device supports:
> >  - Master mode
> >  - One physical bus
> >  - Polling mode
> >
> > The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
> > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig:config I2C_MLXCPLD
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Shych <michaelsh@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
> 
> Applied to for-next, thanks!

Thank you very,

Vadim.