linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: vf610-zii-dev-rev-b: Add missing newline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 27 Nov 2016 22:35:16 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
Cc:     Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: vf610-zii-dev-rev-b: Add missing newline

On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 10:30:54PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Am 27.11.2016 um 22:17 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 08:54:44PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Found while reviewing Marvell dsa bindings usage.
> > 
> > Hi Andreas
> > 
> > It is good practice to put the maintainer you expect to accept the
> > patch on the To: line. You have at least two different maintainers on
> > Cc: so it is currently ambiguous. And these lists can be high volume,
> > so without a copy in the maintainers inbox, patches can be overlooked.
> 
> As a vf610 DT patch with LAKML in To I am expecting it to be handled by
> Shawn or anyone from the NXP/ARM side.

So please have Shawn as To:

The patch you are fixing went through Dave Miller, who is also on Cc:,
hence the ambiguity.

      Andrew