linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:27:08 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf tool: Add time-based utility functions

On 11/28/16 6:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 02:39:54PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..4368a481251d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>> +#ifndef _TIME_UTILS_H_
>> +#define _TIME_UTILS_H_
>> +
>> +struct perf_time {
>> +	u64 start, end;
>> +};
> 
> hum, it's more interval rather than 'time'
> would perf_interval, perf_time_interval suit better?

I'll flip to perf_interval.

ack to the other 2 comments on this patch.