lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:13:31 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc:     jbrunet@...libre.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, carlo@...one.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, neolynx@...il.com,
        andrew@...n.ch, narmstrong@...libre.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/4] Fix OdroidC2 Gigabit Tx link issue

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:43:20 -0800

> On 11/29/2016 04:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
>> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:46:45 +0100
>> 
>>> This patchset fixes an issue with the OdroidC2 board (DWMAC + RTL8211F).
>>> The platform seems to enter LPI on the Rx path too often while performing
>>> relatively high TX transfer. This eventually break the link (both Tx and
>>> Rx), and require to bring the interface down and up again to get the Rx
>>> path working again.
>>>
>>> The root cause of this issue is not fully understood yet but disabling EEE
>>> advertisement on the PHY prevent this feature to be negotiated.
>>> With this change, the link is stable and reliable, with the expected
>>> throughput performance.
>>>
>>> The patchset adds options in the generic phy driver to disable EEE
>>> advertisement, through device tree. The way it is done is very similar
>>> to the handling of the max-speed property.
>> 
>> Patches 1-3 applied to net-next, thanks.
> 
> Meh, there was a v4 submitted shortly after, and I objected to the whole
> idea of using that kind of Device Tree properties to disable EEE, we can
> send reverts though..

Sorry, I lost this in all the discussion, I can revert.

Just send me a revert of the entire merge commit
a152c91889556df17ca6d8ea134fb2cb4ac9f893 with a short
description of why and I'll apply it.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists