linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/21] 4.4.36-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 09:53:58 -0500 (EST)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     maan@...bingen.mpg.de
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com, alexander.h.duyck@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/21] 4.4.36-stable review

From: Andre Noll <maan@...bingen.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 15:04:38 +0100

> On Wed, Nov 30, 14:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote
>> > It fixes a regression introduced in 4.4.34 which makes systems
>> > unbootable for us. We are currently running that patch on top of
>> > 4.4.35 and I can confirm that it fixes the issue.
>> 
>> I wait for networking stable patches to come from the networking
>> maintainer, as he batches them up and runs them through testing before
>> forwarding them on.
>> 
>> That being said, this looks like an "easy" one to take, Davie, any
>> objection to me queueing this up now?
> 
> OK, thanks for the clarification. There is no hurry, I just wanted to
> make sure the patch doesn't get lost.

There is never any ambiguity or guessing for networking patches, you
can always simply check right here to see if a networking patch is
pending to be sent to -stable:

	http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/bundle/davem/stable/?submitter=&state=*&q=&archive=