linux-kernel - Re: next: Commit 'mm: Prevent __alloc_pages_nodemask() RCU CPU stall ...' causing hang on sparc32 qemu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:21:59 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: next: Commit 'mm: Prevent __alloc_pages_nodemask() RCU CPU stall
 ...' causing hang on sparc32 qemu

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 04:03:33AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 02:52:11AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/29/2016 11:02 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:32:51PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>On 11/29/2016 05:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >>>On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 01:23:08PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >>>>Hi Paul,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>most of my qemu tests for sparc32 targets started to fail in next-20161129.
> > >>>>The problem is only seen in SMP builds; non-SMP builds are fine.
> > >>>>Bisect points to commit 2d66cccd73436 ("mm: Prevent __alloc_pages_nodemask()
> > >>>>RCU CPU stall warnings"); reverting that commit fixes the problem.
> 
> And I have dropped this patch.  Michal Hocko showed me the error of
> my ways with this patch.
> 

:-)

On another note, I still get RCU tracebacks in the s390 tests.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/page_alloc.c:3775

That is caused by 'rcu: Maintain special bits at bottom of ->dynticks counter';
if I recall correctly we had discussed that earlier.

Thanks,
Guenter