linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] core-api ReST: assoc_array, atomic_ops, local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:51:29 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] core-api ReST: assoc_array, atomic_ops,
 local_ops

On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:30:52 +0100
Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com> wrote:

> Some more ReSTification of core-api's: assoc_array, atomic_ops and local_ops. A
> fourth patch removes a warning about a bullet list without ending at
> firmware_class.c

OK, I've merged patches 1-3.  Peter, if you ever want to edit atomic_ops,
just send it meward when you're done and I'll deal with any formatting
issues.

Silvio, if you wanted to take this further, the assoc_array code is
nicely decorated with kerneldoc comments; using those in the
documentation would be a nice thing.  There are some kerneldoc comments
for the atomic functions, but that seems rather more erratic.

Part 4 (firmware_class.c) is a bit off my turf, so I don't think I can
apply it.  From what I can tell looking at the history, Andrew Morton
might be a logical target for that patch.

Thanks,

jon