lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:45:02 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        "Punit Agrawal" <punit.agrawal@....com>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / APEI: Fix NMI notification handling

On 2016/12/2 7:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2016 11:47:17 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:29:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Well, there's another ARM-related patch touching APEI.
>>>
>>> I guess whoever takes this one should also take the other one and
>>> honestly they can go in via any tree as far as I'm concerned, I'm just trying to
>>> avoid merge clashes here. :-)
>> Maybe have ARM-folk ACK the other one and take both through your ACPI
>> tree? They both do have ACPI in common :-)
> That one have been ACKed already.
>
> OK, I'll take them both.

Thank you very much :)

Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ