linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] ubifs: Maintain a parent pointer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:40 +0100
From:   Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, david@...ma-star.at, tytso@....edu,
        dedekind1@...il.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ubifs: Maintain a parent pointer

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>  
> +	if (new_dir != old_dir) {
> +		fst_inode_ui->parent_inum = new_dir->i_ino;
> +		snd_inode_ui->parent_inum = old_dir->i_ino;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (old_dir != new_dir) {
>  		if (S_ISDIR(fst_inode->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(snd_inode->i_mode)) {
>  			inc_nlink(new_dir);

Insignificant thing, but use the existing if-statment instead?

Cheers,
Marcus Folkesson