lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:31:27 +0530
From:   PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@...il.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, davem@...emloft.net,
        maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: sun4i-ss: support the Security System PRNG

>> The hwrng interface was always meant to be an interface for real
>> hardware random number generators.  People rely on that so we
>> should not provide bogus entropy sources through this interface.
>>
>
> Why not adding a KCONFIG HW_RANDOM_ACCEPT_ALSO_PRNG with big warning ?
> Or a HW_PRNG Kconfig which do the same than hwrandom with /dev/prng ?
> With that it will be much easier to convert in-tree PRNG that you want to remove.

I do have driver for a PRNG that I was planning to post in sometime.
Upon seeing this thread I think the code has to be changed.

I completely agree with Corentin, adding /dev/prng or /dev/hw_prng
will make it easier to move existing code. It can be made explicit
that using new device will provide only pseudo random number.

Thanks,
PrasannaKumar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ