linux-kernel - Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:37:40 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, "xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        "lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

On Thu 08-12-16 07:30:43, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 13:26 +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 07-12-16 06:57:06, James Bottomley wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf
> > > -pc
> > > is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot
> > > subscribe to it.
> > > 
> > > There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we
> > > expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the
> > > discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe
> > > to a
> > > new list.
> > 
> > There used to be lsf@...ts.linux-foundation.org. Is it not active
> > anymore?
> 
> Not until we get the list of invitees sorted out.  And then it's only
> for stuff actually to do with lsf (like logistics, bof or session
> requests or other meetups).  Any technical stuff should still be cc'd
> to the relevant mailing list.

OK, I tend to forget about that. Thanks for the clarification!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs