[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:12:06 +0000
From: Ben Evans <bevans@...y.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ben Evans <bevans@...y.com>
CC: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
"Oleg Drokin" <oleg.drokin@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] staging: lustre: headers: sort headers affected by
obdo move
On 12/12/16, 11:34 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
wrote:
>What is this mythical guidelines, and why does it differ from the kernel
>source ones?
>
>And again, why is this patch required?
>
>thanks,
>
>greg k-h
>
Here are the general guidelines for your reading pleasure:
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Coding_Style_Guidelines
The specific guidelines on organizing #includes are here:
http://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_Style_Guide_Includes
-Ben Evans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists