[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 02:00:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, jolsa@...hat.com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI / CPPC: Fix per-CPU pointers management
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2016-12-10 00:52:28 [+0100], Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> The crash fixed by this is exposed by the ITMT (asymmetric packing) series
>> (which involves using ACPI CPPC on x86), so IMO it would be good to route it
>> through tip along with that series.
>
> can we get this merged into the original patch please?
Functionally, that patch has a little to do with the fix, so I'd
rather not do that.
> This is default y and breaks bisecting.
Instead, I would reorder the series to put the fix in front of that patch.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists