lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Dec 2016 02:19:08 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
        Scott Bauer <sbauer@....utah.edu>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 4/3] random: use siphash24 instead
 of md5 for get_random_int/long

Hey Ted,

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
> I think this opens up a big window for optimizing it even
> further.

I optimized it a bit further and siphash is now the clear winner over chacha:

[    1.784801] random benchmark!!
[    1.785161] get_random_long # cycles: 415983
[    1.785595] get_random_long_chacha # cycles: 242047
[    1.785997] get_random_long_siphash # cycles: 137130
[    1.787450] get_random_bytes # cycles: 1452985
[    1.787947] get_random_int # cycles: 343323
[    1.788282] get_random_int_chacha # cycles: 170767
[    1.788656] get_random_int_siphash # cycles: 86384
[    1.789764] get_random_bytes # cycles: 2279519

And even still, there is more that could be optimized. Therefore, I'll
continue to keep this patch in the series and will CC you on the next
patch set that goes out.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ