linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: sxgbe: remove private tx queue lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 17 Dec 2016 18:31:50 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc:     Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>, bh74.an@...sung.com,
        ks.giri@...sung.com, vipul.pandya@...sung.com,
        peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: ethernet: sxgbe: remove private tx queue lock

On Thu 2016-12-15 23:33:22, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> On 15.12.2016 22:32, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> 
> > Ah ok. Then maybe priv->hw->dma->stop_tx() does not do the job correctly (stop the
> > tx path properly) and the HW is still active on the tx path while the tx buffers are
> > freed. OTOH stmmac_release() also stops the phy before the tx (and rx) paths are stopped.
> > Did you try to stop the phy fist in stmmac_tx_err_work(), too?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Lino
> > 
> 
> And this is the "sledgehammer" approach: Do a complete shutdown and restart
> of the hardware in case of tx error (against net-next and only
>compile tested).

Wow, thanks a lot. I'll try to get the driver back to the non-working
state, and try it.

I believe I have some idea what is wrong there. (Missing memory barriers).

> +static void stmmac_tx_err_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct stmmac_priv *priv = container_of(work, struct stmmac_priv,
> +						tx_err_work);
> +	/* restart netdev */
> +	rtnl_lock();
> +	stmmac_release(priv->dev);
> +	stmmac_open(priv->dev);
> +	rtnl_unlock();
> +}

Won't this up/down the interface, in a way userspace can observe?

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)