lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:38:23 +0530 From: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com> To: <arnd@...db.de>, <catalin.marinas@....com> CC: <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>, <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>, <pinskia@...il.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>, <joseph@...esourcery.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>, <szabolcs.nagy@....com>, <klimov.linux@...il.com>, <Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com>, <agraf@...e.de>, <Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com>, <kilobyte@...band.pl>, <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <philipp.tomsich@...obroma-systems.com>, <manuel.montezelo@...il.com>, <linyongting@...wei.com>, <maxim.kuvyrkov@...aro.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>, <cmetcalf@...hip.com> Subject: Re: [RFC3 nowrap: PATCH v7 00/18] ILP32 for ARM64 On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:32:59PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote: > This series enables aarch64 with ilp32 mode, and as supporting work, > introduces ARCH_32BIT_OFF_T configuration option that is enabled for > existing 32-bit architectures but disabled for new arches (so 64-bit > off_t is is used by new userspace). > > This version is based on kernel v4.9-rc1. It works with glibc-2.24, > and tested with LTP. Hi Arnd, Catalin For last few days I'm trying to rebase this series on current master, and I see significant conflicts and regressions. In fact, every time I rebase on next rc1, I feel like I play a roulette. This is not a significant problem now because it's almost for sure that this series will not get into 4.10, for reasons not related to kernel code. And I have time to deal with regressions. But in general, I'd like to try my patches on top of other candidates for next merge window. I cannot read all emails in LKML, but I can easily detect problems and join to the discussion at early stage if I see any problem. This is probably a noob question, and there are well-known branches, like Andrew Morton's one. But at this stage it's very important to have this series prepared for merge, and I'd prefer to ask about it. Yury.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists