linux-kernel - Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:00:56 +0100
From:   Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux v4.10.0-rc1] call-traces after suspend-resume (pm? i915? cpu/hotplug?)

On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Dec 2016, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 10:13 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> [ Add some pm | i915 | x86 folks ]
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have built Linux v4.10-rc1 today on my Ubuntu/precise AMD64 system
>>>> and I see some call-traces.
>>>> It is reproducible on suspend and resume.
>>>>
>>>> I cannot say which area touches the problem or if these are several
>>>> independent problems.
>>>>
>>>> For a full dmesg-log see attachments (my linux-config is attached, too).
>>>>
>>>> Here some hunks...
>>>>
>>>> [   29.003601] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
>>>> drivers/base/power/runtime.c:1032
>>>> [   29.003608] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1469, name: Xorg
>>>> [   29.003610] 1 lock held by Xorg/1469:
>>>> [   29.003611]  #0:  (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.+.}, at:
>>>> [<ffffffffa0623c13>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x43/0x140 [i915]
>>>> [   29.003653] CPU: 0 PID: 1469 Comm: Xorg Not tainted
>>>> 4.10.0-rc1-1-iniza-small #1
>>>> [   29.003655] Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>>>> 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
>>>> [   29.003656] Call Trace:
>>>
>>> Just a note, at least 2 machines here refuse to resume with
>>> v4.10-rc1. One has intel graphics, one has AMD. It may or may not have
>>> common cause...
>>>
>>
>> [ Correct linux-pm ML and add Mika & Jani ]
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback.
>>
>> There are some cpu/hotplug fixes post-v4.10-rc1.
>> Give that a try.
>>
>> Yesterday, after answers from drm-intel folks I have seen that a
>> cpu/hotplug commit [1] was reverted in
>> drm-intel.git#drm-intel-nightly.
>> I haven't tried that.
>>
>> It's good when Thomas knows of this and gets in contact with drm-intel folks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [1] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/commit/?h=drm-intel-nightly&id=e558f178f5390185b7324ff4b816b52c6ae3a928
>> [2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-nightly
>>
>> P.S.: Revert "cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks"
>>
>> This reverts commit dc280d93623927570da279e99393879dbbab39e7
>> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Date: Wed Dec 21 20:19:49 2016 +0100
>> cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks
>>
>> It started hanging all machines in CI s3 test:
>> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
>>
>> Bisected-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>
> Thomas -
>
> Indeed, basically all of the boxes in the intel-gfx CI hang at the
> suspend/resume test with dc280d936239 ("cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting
> of callbacks"), and after the revert in the tree that feeds to the CI,
> we're back on track.
>
> I found [1], was hoping to get feedback from Mika whether that helps
> before reporting. Chris also suggested [2] as a quick fix but I don't
> know if anyone tried that.
>

Hi Jani,

I know you were not CCed in the original thread, please see [5].

The patchset from Thomas you mention [1] does fix one of the problems
I have seen, please see [6].
With these post-v4.10-rc1 patches applied a clean revert of Revert
"cpu/hotplug: Prevent overwriting of callbacks" is not possible.

Can you give a clear statement if the quick-fix from Chris is in
combination with the above revert or not?
Against v4.10-rc1?
Tested together with the patchset of Thomas?

Thanks.

Regards,
- Sedat -

[5] http://marc.info/?t=148279390200001&r=1&w=2
[6] http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148282459901267&w=2


> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/12/26/156
> [2] http://paste.debian.net/904973/
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center