lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:43:10 +0530
From:   Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        Niyas Ahmed S T <niyas.ahmed@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, sanath@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: exynos: refactor exynos pcie driver

Hi Bartlomiej,

On 27 December 2016 at 19:05, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, December 23, 2016 04:26:27 PM Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> From: Niyas Ahmed S T <niyas.ahmed@...sung.com>
>>
>> Currently Exynos PCIe driver is only supported for Exynos5440 SoC.
>> This patch does refactoring of Exynos PCIe driver to extend support
>> for other Exynos SoC.
>>
>> Following are the main changes done via this patch:
>> 1) It adds separate structs for memory, clock resources.
>> 2) It add exynos_pcie_ops struct which will allow us to support the
>> differences in resources in different Exynos SoC.
>>
>> No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Niyas Ahmed S T <niyas.ahmed@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
>
> I would also like to see the explanation for 1) (as already
> requested by Jingoo).  Otherwise it all looks fine to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
>

Thanks for review and Reviewed-by tag.

In other thread as a reply to Jaehoon, I have explained reason behind
point no 1, I hope this reason is sufficient to separate these
resources from main exynos_pcie structs.

Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey

> Best regards,
> --
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
> Samsung Electronics
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ