linux-kernel - Re: Auto-conversion of watchdog drivers to use devm functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 4 Jan 2017 01:55:39 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     "wim@...ana.be" <wim@...ana.be>,
        "linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Auto-conversion of watchdog drivers to use devm functions

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 1:53 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> Hi Wim,
>
> With heavy support by Julia Lawall, I created a number of coccinelle scripts
> to auto-convert watchdog platform drivers to use devm functions. The result
> is quite impressive - many drivers won't even need remove functions anymore
> after the conversion.
>
> Question is now how to submit the patches. There are 12 rule files affecting
> a total of 62 drivers. Should I submit one patch per driver (62 patches),
> one patch per rule (12), or one patch per rule file per driver (183) ?

One per driver.

> Also, how should I refer to the rules ? The total number of rule lines
> is more than 1,000, which seems to be a bit much for the commit log (even
> though not all rules apply to all files).

No need, perhaps some URL?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko