lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 5 Jan 2017 00:15:34 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
        Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] More ACPI updates for v4.10-rc1

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please pull from the tag
>>
>>  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git \
>>  acpi-extra-4.10-rc1
>
> I only just noticed that this apparently introduces a new warning:
>
>   ACPI Warning: Table ffffffff9fe6c0a0, Validation count is zero
> before decrement
>
> the bug may be old, it looks like just the check is new to commit 174cc7187e6f.
>
> But it does seem like something is putting a table that wasn't properly gotten.
>
> Hmm?

It certainly seems so, but acpi_tb_put_table() and acpi_put_table()
are only used in a few places and all of them look correct by
inspection.  Nothing obvious at least.

Is this on HW or emulation?

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ