lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 6 Jan 2017 10:03:35 +0100
From:   Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: da850: Add usb device node

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 11:49 PM, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> wrote:
> Hi Sekhar,
>
> On 11/21/2016 10:59 AM, Axel Haslam wrote:
>>
>> Add the usb1 device node for the da850 soc.
>> This will allow boards to use the usb1 port
>> when booting through DT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index 1bb1f6d..fbd50d6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -406,6 +406,14 @@
>>                                         >;
>>                         status = "disabled";
>>                 };
>> +               usb1: usb@...000 {
>> +                       compatible = "ti,da830-ohci";
>> +                       reg = <0x225000 0x1000>;
>> +                       interrupts = <59>;
>> +                       phys = <&usb_phy 1>;
>> +                       phy-names = "usb-phy";
>> +                       status = "disabled";
>> +               };
>>                 gpio: gpio@...000 {
>>                         compatible = "ti,dm6441-gpio";
>>                         gpio-controller;
>>
>
>
> This patch can be pickup up now. I have just tested with next-20171015 +
> linux-davinci/master.

Yes, the regulator patches, are not actually needed for the lcdk, since
it does not have the over current pin connected to a gpio.

ill resend v2 removing the phy from the dts so that they can be both
applied.

-Axel.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ