linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2017 19:47:32 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG
 Decoder



On 09/01/17 19:45, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
>
> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> Hi Rick,
>>
>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote:
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you
>>> have
>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could
>>> merge
>>> the source code and dt-binding first?
>>
>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is
>> the reason
>> it hasn't been merged yet?
>>
>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging
>> this media
>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro
>> can handle.
>>
>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until
>> it is
>> merged.
>>
>
> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems
> that it got never posted.
>
> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds
> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi?
>

Ah I forgot, dts patches should go through my tree, so Hans please don't 
merge this patch. Bindings should go through your branch though.

Thanks,
Matthias