linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:07:33 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the rockchip tree

Hi Andrew,

I have been wondering this
because this series is touching files across sub-systems.

I expected it would be pulled into upstream
during the previous MW, but it was not.
How long will it stay in your branch?



2017-01-09 11:55 GMT+09:00 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
>
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
>
> between commit:
>
>   2c257ce6ab6f ("dt-bindings: add used but undocumented rockchip grf compatible values")
>
> from the rockchip tree and patch:
>
>    "scripts/spelling.txt: add "followings" pattern and fix typo instances"
>
> from the akpm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> index c6e62cb30712,76d6ccf677f5..000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.txt
> @@@ -10,19 -9,16 +10,19 @@@ From RK3368 SoCs, the GRF is divided in
>
>   Required Properties:
>
> - - compatible: GRF should be one of the followings
> + - compatible: GRF should be one of the following:
>  +   - "rockchip,rk3036-grf", "syscon": for rk3036
>      - "rockchip,rk3066-grf", "syscon": for rk3066
>      - "rockchip,rk3188-grf", "syscon": for rk3188
>      - "rockchip,rk3228-grf", "syscon": for rk3228
>      - "rockchip,rk3288-grf", "syscon": for rk3288
>      - "rockchip,rk3368-grf", "syscon": for rk3368
>      - "rockchip,rk3399-grf", "syscon": for rk3399
> - - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the followings
> + - compatible: PMUGRF should be one of the following:
>      - "rockchip,rk3368-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3368
>      - "rockchip,rk3399-pmugrf", "syscon": for rk3399
>  +- compatible: SGRF should be one of the following
>  +   - "rockchip,rk3288-sgrf", "syscon": for rk3288
>   - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
>     region.
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada