linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] adv7511 EDID probing improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 12 Jan 2017 09:52:41 +0530
From:   Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v3] adv7511 EDID probing improvements



On 01/12/2017 05:36 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Archit Taneja <architt@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01/04/2017 01:11 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>>>
>>> Hope everyone had a good newyears!
>>>
>>> Wanted to re-send out v3 of this patch set improving the EDID
>>> probing on the adv7511 used on HiKey, for consideration for
>>> merging for 4.11
>>>
>>> The first three patches are fixups that are hopefully straight
>>> forward, integrating feedback I got from Laurant.
>>>
>>> The last two patches try to clean up and resue code, which as
>>> a side effect avoids an issue I'm seeing where something is
>>> going wrong with the regmap cache state for the
>>> ADV7511_REG_EDID_I2C_ADDR(0x43) register which results in
>>> i2c_transfer errors if we don't do the
>>> regcache_sync/_mark_dirty() calls. I suspect there might be a
>>> better solution there, but have not gotten any other suggestions
>>> so I wanted to go ahead and submit these.
>>>
>>> Thoughts and feedback would be appreciated!
>>
>>
>> Tested on DB410c on 4.10-rc3. Works well for me.
>
> Archit: Thanks for the testing! Is there anything else you need from
> me (or others) to queue this for 4.11? Or should I be submitting it to
> someone else?

A final Ack/Test from Laurent for ADV7511 would be nice. I'll be the one
queuing it to drm-misc for 4.11.

Thanks,
Archit


>
> thanks
> -john
>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project