lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:02:27 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Rick Chang <rick.chang@...iatek.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Minghsiu Tsai <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
        srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG
 Decoder

Hi James,

On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>>> Hi Rick,
>>>
>>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote:
>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>
>>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have
>>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge
>>>> the source code and dt-binding first?
>>>
>>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason
>>> it hasn't been merged yet?
>>>
>>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media
>>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle.
>>>
>>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is
>>> merged.
>>>
>>
>> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems
>> that it got never posted.
>>
>> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds
>> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi?
>>
>
> James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three
> patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send
> new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can
> accept and merge to 4.11.
>

Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into 
v4.10-next/dts32

Hans will you take v9 of this patch set?
Then I'll take the dts patch.

Regards,
Matthias

> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/
>
> Thanks,
> Eddie
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ