linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0200
From:   Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@...aro.org>,
        Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        John Youn <johnyoun@...opsys.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Chen Yu <chenyu56@...wei.com>,
        Vardan Mikayelyan <mvardan@...opsys.com>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5 v2] Fixes and workarounds for dwc2 on HiKey board


Hi,

John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> writes:
> I just wanted to re-send my current queue of patches for dwc2
> controller on the HiKey board, as my last patchset ended up
> colliding with a number of changes that landed in the 4.10-rc
> merge window. 
>
> I've fixed things up and validated these against HiKey. I also
> made a small change to one of the patches as suggested by Vardan.
>
> This does exclude my patchset[1] to add extcon support to dwc2,
> which John Youn suspects a pending rework of the dwc2 fifo init
> logic might make unnecssary (however, no such changes appeared
> to have landed in 4.10-rc, so I'm still using that patchset in
> my testing).
>
> I'm also out for the holidays after today, and while I suspect
> others are likely going to be out as well, I figured I'd send
> these out for a chance at review, rather then sit on them for
> two weeks. I'll resend after the new year addressing any
> feedback I do get though.
>
> Feedback would be greatly appreciated!

John Y, any comments?

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)