linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:51:13 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@...mni.ethz.ch>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] make call_usermodehelper a bit more "safe"

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 05:49:44PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Here's a second cut at my attempt to make call_usermodehelper a bit more
> "safe".  It includes some patches from my previous series, and one new
> one.  In all, this is a much smaller patchset, with better functionality
> in the end.

And of course, I miscounted the patches, there are only 3 patches in
this series, yet I said 0/4 in this email, sorry about that.

greg k-h