linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] ARM: davinci: da850: model the SATA refclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Jan 2017 12:40:11 -0600
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/14] ARM: davinci: da850: model the SATA refclk

On 01/17/2017 06:26 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Register a dummy clock modelling the external SATA oscillator for
> da850 DT mode. For non-DT boot we don't register the clock - instead
> we rely on the default MPY value defined in the da850 ahci driver (as
> is done currently).

Why not register a clock for non-DT boot as well?