lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 03:05:57 +0000 From: "Y.T. Tang" <yuantian.tang@....com> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> CC: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: added ls2088a platforms support > -----Original Message----- > From: Tejun Heo [mailto:htejun@...il.com] On Behalf Of Tejun Heo > Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2017 3:54 AM > To: Y.T. Tang <yuantian.tang@....com> > Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; linux-ide@...r.kernel.org; > devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm- > kernel@...ts.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] ahci: qoriq: added ls2088a platforms support > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 02:12:01PM +0800, yuantian.tang@....com wrote: > > From: Tang Yuantian <Yuantian.Tang@....com> > > > > Ls2088a is new introduced arm-based soc with sata support with > > following features: > > 1. Complies with the serial ATA 3.0 specification and the AHCI 1.3.1 > > specification > > 2. Contains a high-speed descriptor-based DMA controller 3. Supports > > the following: > > a. Speeds of 1.5 Gb/s (first-generation SATA), 3 Gb/s > > (second-generation SATA), and 6 Gb/s (third-generation SATA) > > b. FIS-based switching > > c. Native command queuing (NCQ) commands > > d. Port multiplier operation > > e. Asynchronous notification > > f. SATA BIST mode > > > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.tang@....com> > > Reverted due to build failure. Did you even try to compile it before > submission? We all make mistakes and that's fine but this one seems a bit > too careless. Please don't do this. > Sorry for the trouble. I never send a patch without testing. This patch depends on other two patches which I sent a long time ago which I thought they were merged. Anyway, my mistake. I will resend all the patches with correct order. Regards, Yuantian > Thanks. > > -- > tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists