linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add platform clock for BayTrail platforms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:00:28 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Irina Tirdea <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] Add platform clock for BayTrail platforms

On 01/18, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 15:57 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > These patches specifically enable the audio MCLK required by Baytrail
> > CR devices. It is the remaining part of a bigger set of patches
> > (already merged in Mark Brown's tree) that enable sound for Baytrail
> > CR
> > devices (especially Asus T100TAF) [1]. They include the clock driver
> > and clock enabling in the pmc_atom code (along with moving of the
> > non-architectural pmc_atom driver code into drivers/platform/x86 as
> > suggested by Thomas Gleixner [2]). This move includes a new header in
> > include/linux/platform_data/x86/. While there is an agreement that the
> > definitions for PMC clocks are not really platform data this location
> > is seen as a good-enough compromise with an agreement between Darren
> > Hart and Andy Shevchenko [3]
> > 
> > [1] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-August/1
> > 11704.html
> > [2] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-October/
> > 113936.html
> > [3] http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2016-December
> > /115892.html
> > 
> 
> Stephen, I see no issues with the patches. If you want to push them
> through your tree, take a tag from PDx86 subsystem point of view:

Does PDx86 == platform device x86? I can provide a stable branch
in clk tree for platform tree, or platform x86 maintainer can ack
the platform/x86 patches and I can take the whole batch through
clk tree.

> 
> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project