lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 22 Jan 2017 13:23:07 +0000
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, gnurou@...il.com
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iio: stx104: Add GPIO set_multiple callback function
 support

On 19/01/17 15:06, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> The Apex Embedded Systems STX104 series provides a digital output
> register where 4 lines may be set at a time. This patch add support for
> the set_multiple callback function, thus allowing multiple digital
> output lines to be set more efficiently in groups.
> 
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
> Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
> Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>
> Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/stx104.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stx104.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stx104.c
> index 7e3645749eaf..6971293909f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stx104.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stx104.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,28 @@ static void stx104_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stx104gpio->lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> +static void stx104_gpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> +	unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
> +{
> +	struct stx104_gpio *const stx104gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/* verify masked GPIO are output */
> +	if (!(*mask & 0xF0))
> +		return;
> +
> +	*mask >>= 4;
> +	*bits >>= 4;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&stx104gpio->lock, flags);
> +
> +	stx104gpio->out_state &= ~*mask;
> +	stx104gpio->out_state |= *mask & *bits;
> +	outb(stx104gpio->out_state, stx104gpio->base);
> +
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stx104gpio->lock, flags);
> +}
> +
>  static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
>  {
>  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> @@ -330,6 +352,7 @@ static int stx104_probe(struct device *dev, unsigned int id)
>  	stx104gpio->chip.direction_output = stx104_gpio_direction_output;
>  	stx104gpio->chip.get = stx104_gpio_get;
>  	stx104gpio->chip.set = stx104_gpio_set;
> +	stx104gpio->chip.set_multiple = stx104_gpio_set_multiple;
>  	stx104gpio->base = base[id] + 3;
>  	stx104gpio->out_state = 0x0;
>  
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ