lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:18:35 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Kalyan Kinthada" <Kalyan.Kinthada@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/5] pinctrl: mvebu: pinctrl driver for 98DX3236 SoC

On 20/01/17 10:10, Chris Packham wrote:
> On 19/01/17 23:03, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:12:18PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote:
>>> +static struct mvebu_mpp_ctrl mv98dx3236_mpp_controls[] = {
>>> +	MPP_FUNC_CTRL(0, 32, NULL, armada_xp_mpp_ctrl),
>>> +};
>>
>> As Linus has taken my mvebu pinctrl series, this will need to be
>> changed to "mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl" rather than "armada_xp_mpp_ctrl"
>> when it's merged.
>>
>
> OK I was thinking about rebasing my series so maybe it's time.
>

I noticed the mvebu pinctrl series isn't in Linus's (Torvalds) tree. Is 
this on the cards for v4.10 or is it waiting for the next merge window? 
In other words should I send v5 or my series now or wait for this to be 
merged so I can rebase on top of it?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ