linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/13] mmc: sunxi: Mask DATA0 when updating the clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:16:13 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/13] mmc: sunxi: Mask DATA0 when updating the clock

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:18:46AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > The A64 MMC controllers need DATA0 to be masked while updating the clock,
> > otherwise any subsequent command will result in a timeout.
> 
> Could you elaborate on what mask DATA0 really means? I don't follow.

To be honest, I don't really know :)

This is how it's called both in the vendor tree and the datasheet. I
*think* it might be the first data line on the bus, but I'm not sure
exactly why that would cause any issue when updating the clock.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)