linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: vmscan: only write dirty pages that the scanner has seen twice

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:29:23 +0100
From:   Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: vmscan: only write dirty pages that the scanner
 has seen twice

On Mon 23-01-17 13:16:40, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Dirty pages can easily reach the end of the LRU while there are still
> clean pages to reclaim around. Don't let kswapd write them back just
> because there are a lot of them. It costs more CPU to find the clean
> pages, but that's almost certainly better than to disrupt writeback
> from the flushers with LRU-order single-page writes from reclaim. And
> the flushers have been woken up by that point, so we spend IO capacity
> on flushing and CPU capacity on finding the clean cache.
> 
> Only start writing dirty pages if they have cycled around the LRU
> twice now and STILL haven't been queued on the IO device. It's
> possible that the dirty pages are so sparsely distributed across
> different bdis, inodes, memory cgroups, that the flushers take forever
> to get to the ones we want reclaimed. Once we see them twice on the
> LRU, we know that's the quicker way to find them, so do LRU writeback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 915fc658de41..df0fe0cc438e 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -1153,13 +1153,18 @@ static unsigned long shrink_page_list(struct list_head *page_list,
>  
>  		if (PageDirty(page)) {
>  			/*
> -			 * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages to
> -			 * avoid risk of stack overflow but only writeback
> -			 * if many dirty pages have been encountered.
> +			 * Only kswapd can writeback filesystem pages
> +			 * to avoid risk of stack overflow. But avoid
> +			 * injecting inefficient single-page IO into
> +			 * flusher writeback as much as possible: only
> +			 * write pages when we've encountered many
> +			 * dirty pages, and when we've already scanned
> +			 * the rest of the LRU for clean pages and see
> +			 * the same dirty pages again (PageReclaim).
>  			 */
>  			if (page_is_file_cache(page) &&
> -					(!current_is_kswapd() ||
> -					 !test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags))) {
> +			    (!current_is_kswapd() || !PageReclaim(page) ||
> +			     !test_bit(PGDAT_DIRTY, &pgdat->flags))) {
>  				/*
>  				 * Immediately reclaim when written back.
>  				 * Similar in principal to deactivate_page()
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs