linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv3 4/5] arm: mvebu: Add device tree for 98DX3236 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:24:46 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 4/5] arm: mvebu: Add device tree for 98DX3236 SoCs

On 27/01/17 04:10, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> +		internal-regs {

[snip]

>> +
>> +		dfx-registers {
> node label
>

[snip]

>> +		switch {
> node label
>

These are peers to the internal-regs, i.e. parts of the SoC with 
mappable windows in the address space. Do they really need a label? 
Their subnodes absolutely need (and have) labels.