linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 22:48:31 +0530
From:   "Gideon D'souza" <gidisrael@...il.com>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] m68k: replaced gcc specific macros with ones from compiler.h

>You've gone from printf to print here.  This commit is breaking the
>linux-next builds on m68k.  I see the kbuild bot tripped over the same
>issue and did the same bisect.

I did do a build before sending, as you may guess I'm not on an m68k machine.

Forgive the newbie please!

I'm re-sending my patch with the correction.

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 7:14 AM, Gideon Israel Dsouza
> <gidisrael@...il.com> wrote:
>> There is <linux/compiler.h> which provides macros for various gcc specific
>> constructs. Eg: __weak for __attribute__((weak)). I've cleaned all
>> instances of gcc specific attributes with the right macros for all files
>> under /arch/m68k
>>
>> This patch depends on the previous with changes in
>
>> @@ -17,6 +18,6 @@ void nf_init(void);
>>  void nf_shutdown(void);
>>
>>  void nfprint(const char *fmt, ...)
>> -       __attribute__ ((format (printf, 1, 2)));
>> +       __print(1, 2);
>>
>
> You've gone from printf to print here.  This commit is breaking the
> linux-next builds on m68k.  I see the kbuild bot tripped over the same
> issue and did the same bisect.
>
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12916834/
>
> Paul.
> --