linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: Harden against open(..., O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:49:32 -0800
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     security@...nel.org
Cc:     Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frank Filz <ffilzlnx@...dspring.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] fs: Harden against open(..., O_CREAT, 02777) in a setgid directory

Currently, if you open("foo", O_WRONLY | O_CREAT | ..., 02777) in a
directory that is setgid and owned by a different gid than current's
fsgid, you end up with an SGID executable that is owned by the
directory's GID.  This is a Bad Thing (tm).  Exploiting this is
nontrivial because most ways of creating a new file create an empty
file and empty executables aren't particularly interesting, but this
is nevertheless quite dangerous.

Harden against this type of attack by detecting this particular
corner case (unprivileged program creates SGID executable inode in
SGID directory owned by a different GID) and clearing the new
inode's SGID bit.

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---
 fs/inode.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index 0e1e141b094c..f6acb9232263 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -2025,12 +2025,30 @@ void inode_init_owner(struct inode *inode, const struct inode *dir,
 			umode_t mode)
 {
 	inode->i_uid = current_fsuid();
+	inode->i_gid = current_fsgid();
+
 	if (dir && dir->i_mode & S_ISGID) {
+		bool changing_gid = !gid_eq(inode->i_gid, dir->i_gid);
+
 		inode->i_gid = dir->i_gid;
-		if (S_ISDIR(mode))
+
+		if (S_ISDIR(mode)) {
 			mode |= S_ISGID;
-	} else
-		inode->i_gid = current_fsgid();
+		} else if (((mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP))
+			   && S_ISREG(mode) && changing_gid
+			   && !capable(CAP_FSETID)) {
+			/*
+			 * Whoa there!  An unprivileged program just
+			 * tried to create a new executable with SGID
+			 * set in a directory with SGID set that belongs
+			 * to a different group.  Don't let this program
+			 * create a SGID executable that ends up owned
+			 * by the wrong group.
+			 */
+			mode &= ~S_ISGID;
+		}
+	}
+
 	inode->i_mode = mode;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_init_owner);
-- 
2.9.3